The other day I watched Woody Allen's latest film, Anything Else. It was widely panned as his failed attempt to reach a younger audience, but I think that was a marketing mistake rather than his actual intent. I was going to post about how I liked the movie a lot: lots of funny lines, good performances from Jason Biggs, Christina Ricci, and Stockard Channning (although Biggs and Ricci do hit some false notes, as does Channing literally when trying to sing), interesting camera work, and with some subtle things going on underneath the surface, including some structural and thematic oddities and the multiple meanings of the title. But then I read a thread on the IMDb message board that offered an alternate way of looking at the movie, and my head exploded.
The idea is that Woody Allen's character, Dobel, is a time traveler who's come back to talk to his younger self (Jason Biggs's character, Falk) and break him out of bad relationships with his girlfriend, his manager, and his shrink, guiding him to a better life as a sitcom writer in LA. You could argue that the movie is just a metaphorical way for Woody to reflect on his life and think about how he could have changed things, and that it shouldn't be considered a literal plot device; there's certainly nothing in the movie to explicitly indicate that he's actually travelled through time. But there are a lot of little coincidences: a joke about quantum physics and time and space being the same thing, various references to time and prediction, and the cab driver at the end of the movie saying the same thing to Falk that Dobel said a cab driver said to him long ago ("it's like anything else"). I also like the idea that the reason Dobel has such a strange vocabulary (tergiversate, adventitious) is that language has evolved in the future so that these words are more commonplace. But even more things fit into place if you imagine that Dobel came from a specific apocalyptic future, and he's trying to warn Falk about increasing anti-Semitism, to teach him to fight back and take a stand against oppression (like smashing the car of the bullies who steal his parking space), and to arm him with a rifle and a survival kit and even get him out of New York altogether. Near the end of the movie there's a close-up of Falk typing something that Dobel said to him: the Nazi atrocities were so bad that if the entire human race were destroyed as a penalty it would be justified. The way this was emphasized in the movie seemed particularly odd to me while watching, which makes me think it really is some sort of intentional clue of what happens in the future timeline. One person brought up the possibility that Dobel was a ghost, Sixth Sense-style, who barely makes an impression on anyone but Falk, dropping the vase when handed to him, etc., but I think this is kind of a stretch. (Although it does make me think of his 1990 movie Alice, with magic powders of invisibility and insubstantiality.)
Anyway, check it out, it's running on HBO for the next couple weeks.
September 5 2004, 03:51:14 UTC 7 years ago
Woah...
That's not bad... I just thought the "anything else" comment was more of a joke that it was repeated. But, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I thought it was rather dumb that Woody had his character do that mysterious thing where he had to hide (it made you think he killed someone). Instead, he was just returning to his own time.September 5 2004, 04:51:14 UTC 7 years ago
September 5 2004, 15:31:08 UTC 7 years ago
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that any of this was actually intended by Woody. It'd be cool if it was, but it's still kinda cool even if it's all coincidence. Anyway, I'm putting it on the tape with Final.
September 6 2004, 00:40:38 UTC 7 years ago
October 23 2004, 03:43:42 UTC 7 years ago
Anyway, that's a pretty cool theory--along the lines of the Dark Side of the Moon being an "alternate soundtrack" to the Wizard of Oz: neat coincidence with nothing to do with the creators' intent. All of these are more easily explained by the things the movie explains them by. (The cab driver quote isn't realistically explained, but it is explained in a sort of 'all cab drivers are alike' and 'Dobel is a smart kind of guy' things.)
There seems a lot of disagreement about Biggs' performance; I thought it was ok. The main thing it seems to be panned for is not Woody's failure to reach out to youth audiences, but his bizarre misunderstanding of what modern youth culture is like. I mean, sure, you can say he's writing about those random rare young adults who have 40-year-old tastes in music and other culture... or you can also say Woody still seems to be writing about his own generation's youth.